Shara Saunsaucie ([info]calico_reaction) wrote,
@ 2007-10-14 15:35:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:fantasy, modern fantasy, novels, paranormal, paranormal romance, ratings: worth the cash, reviews, romance, stephenie meyer, young adult fiction

Meyer, Stephanie: Twilight
Twilight
Writer: Stephenie Meyer
Genre: Young Adult/Paranormal Romance
Pages: 498

I'd never heard of Stephenie Meyer or her books until an article ran in Entertainment Weekly ran just prior to the release of the third book. This came just off the heels of Harry Potter, and the article speculated that Meyer's series was to teenage girls what Harry Potter was to YA on the whole. Or something like that. The point was that Meyer was the "next big thing."

So I was curious, but not overly so. Then a friend of mine recommended the book to me. And I kept seeing people squee about it on LJ, going so far as to make fan art of the characters, even though the movie hasn't even been cast yet. Curiosity got the better of me so I went ahead and picked it up. And stared at it, suspicious. Finally moved it to my "to-read" pile.

By now, I should know better than to think, "Oh, I'll just read the first chapter before I go work on X, Y, or Z." Really, I should. Because every time I think that, I end up getting sucked into the book and can't put it down until the wee hours of the morning.

Which is pretty much what happened with Twilight.



It's easy to see why teenage girls love this book (series) so much. I mean, what girl DOESN'T want to imagine herself attracting the adoration and love of a perfectly beautiful and gorgeous guy who's completely devoted to her, especially if she herself isn't exactly the prettiest girl in the market, and is also accident-prone? Couple that with the subconscious attraction girls/women seem to have for boys/men who aren't good for them, and you've got gold. After all, even though Edward IS a vampire, he'd never intentionally hurt Bella, so the fact that he's a vampire isn't important. What's important is the TRUE LOVE.

Seriously, it's not hard to figure out why the book is so popular, particularly with its target audience.

What drew me in to this was first Bella's voice. I'm a fan of the first person narrative, and even though she sounded old for her age (a fact that's addressed in the book, so good for Meyer), I was hooked pretty quickly. I was curious why she left her mom, who she clearly loves, to live with her dad in a place she clearly hates. I was amused by the fact she ended up LOVING the clunker of a truck her dad bought for her, because in this day of materialism, it's hard to find people who don't need or want something new and shiny (and I know when I was Bella's age, the LAST thing I wanted was a clunker of a truck). So she's not your usual teen, but usual enough in her shyness and awkwardness that you can't help but sympathize with her. Her first day in high school felt pretty realistic, and while I was at first dubious about all the boys fawning all over her, it made sense, and even Bella pointed it out: in a small town, someone new is BOUND to be the most attractive option in the place, simply because the newness makes that person attractive.

But what hooked me was Edward's reaction to her: the hate and the malice, and even though I knew ahead of time he was a vampire, I still couldn't figure out what his aversion was (even though it turned out to be obvious). So I kept reading to figure out what Edward's problem was and how Bella would handle it, and found that the more I read, the more I couldn't put it down, because I wanted to find out what would happen next.

I'll admit, I like Edward and Bella better when they're antagonizing each other, but I can see why they fell into their relationship so quickly, because of Edward's need to protect her, something that's hard to do when you have to stay away from the person you're protecting. And I liked Bella's rationalization to figuring out he was a vampire and what she was going to do about it. Not that it was the smartest decision in the world, but she wasn't going to run away either, and I can admire that.

I'm still mulling over the fact that Edward can't read Bella, which is, of course, one of the things that makes her so fascinating to him. I like that he can't, but we don't have a good "explanation" for it either. What does it mean in this world of supernatural creatures? After all, in this book we learn vampires exist, and if you pay attention (Bella isn't), you know werewolves exist in this world too. So is this quirk/ability of Bella's going to lead somewhere? Will it mean something? Or is it merely a device for Edward's fascination and an obstacle that he can't hear her when she needs help?

And while I'm glad the "why don't you just make me a vampire?" issue is addressed in this book, it concerns me a little bit about how much Bella WANTS this to happen. In some ways, it's easy to read her love as pure infatuation. A crush. Which makes her desire to become immortal just so she can stay with Edward even more disturbing, because my adult mind wonders what's going to happen if it doesn't last? Obviously, this is going to be addressed in later books, and it'll be interesting to see how Meyers handles it.

Yes, Bella is often a damsel in distress. But she still makes choices, and that I appreciate. She's the one to come up with the plan to save herself, her family, and keep the Cullen family out of trouble. She's also the one who chooses to confront James, even though it's all a trap. And while I would've liked to see a human way for her to defeat the vampire, I can't complain too much, not yet. Maybe in later books. Meyers has done a pretty good job showing us vampire culture, dispelling some myths while creating new ones (the sunlight thing is a lovely touch), but she won't tell us how one kills a vampire, other than to say it's insanely hard. That irks me a bit, but I can't say I want to see Bella going all slayer over the ass of any vampire who tries to eat her, but again, choices are important. It'll be interesting to see how all of this develops, especially considering that from the moment Bella meets Edward, her number is up. In a way, she's simply living on borrowed time.



So it's easy to see why this book/series is so popular with its intended audience. I enjoyed the hell out of reading it, but I'm not so anxious to get the next books in the series, since I bought this one in trade and the other two are in hardback. And just to quench the need to read them ASAP, I looked up enough spoilers to keep my curiosity at bay. ;) The one thing that has be curious about this book--and maybe it'll come up in later books, but I don't think so--is all the talk about the eroticism of it. Maybe I'm just imagining things, but I swear I kept hearing "erotic" used to describe this book, and I'm sorry, but no. There's nothing erotic about this book. Sensual, yes. Tantalizing, yes. But erotic? No. Maybe there's a different definition of erotic when it comes to adult fiction versus YA fiction, but even considering that possibility, there's nothing in this book that truly be described as erotic.

Writing-wise, Meyer has a few writing ticks, and she's got a horrible dependence on the word "grimace," which is horribly overused in the course of these 500 pages. Still, I couldn't put the book down, and I certainly enjoyed myself while reading it (there's some nice moments of humor, and Bella is a plucky character), so I look forward to the rest of the series. When it comes out in trade, that is.

Next review (still! Sorry!): Visual Journeys: A Tribute to Space Artists edited by Eric T. Reynolds

Next read: Rainbows End by Vernor Vinge



(Post a new comment)


[info]untilyoubelieve
2007-10-14 08:16 pm UTC (link)
and if you pay attention (Bella isn't) haha, very true. As you read the next books, you'll find that she's sort of an idiot when it comes to the obvious. Though I'm an avid fan of these books, I've grown to hate Bella's character. I read on for the vampires - Meyer write a very interesting vampire lore.

I've never seen erotic to describe this books unless it was done by a squealing 12 year old fangirl who wouldn't know erotica from a Disney movie, but later in the series, Bella tries to get more sexual - in a very annoying way.

I hope you enjoy the next two, when you decide to read them. :) I'm note even sure if New Moon is going to come out on paperback or not since it's been released in different editions thrice and none of them in trade.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]calico_reaction
2007-10-14 08:24 pm UTC (link)
I can see how she might become annoying. :)

I keep checking Amazon for the trade link, but so far, no luck. Maybe I'll just get surprised one day when I got to the bookstore. :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]breathesymphony
2007-10-14 10:47 pm UTC (link)
New Moon comes out in paperback next month. I only know because I saw it on the cashier's list at Barnes and Noble!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]calico_reaction
2007-10-14 10:59 pm UTC (link)
Sweet! Thanks for the head's up! :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]kare_chan
2007-10-14 09:15 pm UTC (link)
I haven't read it yet and I am not really that keen on reading it, but it is kinda remarkable that really everyone seems to be all into this.
And I do have it laying around here... maybe... I mean... one day...?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]ow200
2007-10-14 09:25 pm UTC (link)
DO read it xD! Srsly, it's so fanficesque and insanely enjoyable!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]calico_reaction
2007-10-14 09:44 pm UTC (link)
Not EVERYONE'S on the ball with it. :) A friend of mine read it (or tried to, I can't remember which) and wasn't thrilled at all. And I've got misgivings about where this might be going character-wise, but I enjoyed it enough to keep reading the series, so we'll see. :)

No hurry to read it though. ;) Read it when you feel like it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ow200
2007-10-14 09:23 pm UTC (link)
I'm still mulling over the fact that Edward can't read Bella, which is, of course, one of the things that makes her so fascinating to him. I like that he can't, but we don't have a good "explanation" for it either.

I can't really remember if that is completely clarified later on, but Meyer gives a good enough explanation on her website.

Other than that, I agree largely with your review. About the erotic thing; hrmm... Strange. I haven't seen it described as that, but obviously, that doesn't mean anything other than that I'm rather unobservant! I think you're right when you say it is sensual and tantalising... Perhaps those feelings have been confused with erotic?

New Moon has been available in paperback in the States and UK for a while now, I believe. That shouldn't be so hard to get a copy of. Eclipse, on the other hand, won't be out as a paperback for some time.

I feel the series is... Well... Honestly, cliché and not incredibly well-written. Nevertheless, all the books are highly enjoyable and so I can't really criticise in that respect. Anyway, who's to say that the definition of well-written isn't just that the book is enjoyable? (I'm sorry, I have a tendency to ramble.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]calico_reaction
2007-10-14 09:49 pm UTC (link)
I'll have to look for the explanation in her website then, because I'd like to know. :)

I wish I could remember WHERE I heard the erotic thing...I may be making it up, but for some reason, I was under the impression there was SEX in this book, so I was surprised there wasn't. Yet, I think you're right: if anyone's tossing the term erotic around, they're definitely confusing it with "sensual" and "tantalizing".

New Moon is definitely not in paperback in the US. I've looked. And Amazon would've listed it if it were: http://www.amazon.com/New-Moon-Twilight-Book-2/dp/0316160199/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/002-9256272-5725658?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1192398476&sr=8-1

Though, if you HAVE seen a trade copy in the States, I'd love to know where! :) But I plan on waiting, because Eclipse did just come out, so there's not much I can do, unless I fork over the money for the hardcovers.

No worries about the rambling. I do it all the time. ;)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ow200
2007-10-14 09:55 pm UTC (link)
I can tell you now. Basically, Bella has a very private mind and so stuff that works with her mentally (such as Edward's skill to read her mind and a later character's skill to simulate pain in the mind) doesn't... well work.

Lol. Nope, no sex! Quite saddening, really :P! I wouldn't be suprised if they'd been mixed up. The Times nicely summed up the deeper feelings of the novel when they said "Her story, recounted in hypnotic, dreamy prose, encapsulates perfectly the teenage feeling of sexual tension and alienation." (Nope, I haven't got that memorised :P My copy of Twilight is sitting on my desk!) Sadly, I don't think that Stephenie Meyer intended for there to be any deep metaphors in the books, I believe she just intended to tell a good yarn! xD Which dashes all my ideas of the werewolf versus vampire thing being a metaphor for the Native Americans versus the pilgrim settlers...

Seriously? That's strange cos I'm British and it's out here in paperback... And, as an American book, I'd expect it to come out later here! :S Strange. Ach, well... Maybe you should try British Amazon. Though, to be honest, the cost of transport would probably be more than buying the hardback. Why don't you just borrow them off a friend or library?

Lol, glad it's not just me :P

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]untilyoubelieve
2007-10-14 10:01 pm UTC (link)
It was released in a special edition hardcover with a poster and temporary tattoos around the time it was supposed to come out in paperback. I guess Little, Brown publishers is trying to milk it for all it's worth. I wish it would have come out in paperback, I don't like reading hard cover.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ow200
2007-10-14 10:02 pm UTC (link)
Yeah. I thought that might be the case. I HATE when publishers do that with popular books. Same with producers of popular TV shows or movies... Making them more expensive than normal in shops for ages >.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]calico_reaction
2007-10-15 09:20 pm UTC (link)
I don't have a good local library and my friends don't live in close proximity, and I think I'm the first them to read it. At any rate, I don't mind waiting. ;)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]l_heart_stuff
2007-10-14 10:27 pm UTC (link)
you are right about her overuse of particular words. I grimace every time she uses the word grimace. or cringe. and it doesn't get better in the following 2 books. great series though.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]calico_reaction
2007-10-15 09:21 pm UTC (link)
Hee hee...I'm glad I'm not the only one this bothers. :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]keilexandra
2007-10-14 11:22 pm UTC (link)
I assume your overuse of "horrible" in the sentence referring to Meyer's writing ticks is intentional?

I am a fan of the Twilight series, but I am liking them successively less--in Eclipse, I felt like Bella should just turn already and get it over with. But I've known people (in the target demographic) who absolutely hated it, because of Bella's Mary-Sue-ness. Which is totally true, but hey, it's a YA romance.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]calico_reaction
2007-10-15 12:11 am UTC (link)
The "horrible" referring to her overuse of "grimace"? Totally intentional. It's a word writers should use sparingly, and she uses it A LOT.

I can see why people have problems with it, but you're right, it is a YA romance. :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]sorcha_ruel
2007-10-15 01:23 am UTC (link)
I'm somewhat embarrassed to admit that I was so hooked on these books that I finished them all in less than a week. While I enjoyed them, I think Meyer could have easily finished the series in three books. Especially since the third is rather lacking in plot. Apparently it's supposed to be somewhat of a Wuthering Heights parallel with the main characters' flaws on display but even so it's a bit hard to swallow. I'll still read the fourth book, I'm a sucker.

Good review though :)

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]calico_reaction
2007-10-15 01:30 am UTC (link)
I've heard quite a few people finish these books within a week, so I'm glad I don't have the other two on hand. :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]chicklitter
2007-10-15 01:43 am UTC (link)
Hmmmm. I might need to start perusing the YA section. This, and the past few YA novels you've reviewed, sounds pretty interesting (and also a lot like something I probably would've read when I was about 12 or 13).

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]calico_reaction
2007-10-15 02:31 am UTC (link)
I would love to get your opinion on some of these books I've read, particularly this one and Wicked Lovely. :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]chicklitter
2007-10-15 02:35 am UTC (link)
The Smart Bitches, and several people who post regularly in the SB's blogs have nothing but rave reviews for Wicked Lovely. I think as soon as I get the chance to read "fun" stuff again (meaning the next 11 days are nothing but critical theory reading) I might have to check these out. :-)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]calico_reaction
2007-10-15 03:01 am UTC (link)
You definitely should. :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]calico_reaction
2007-10-15 10:56 am UTC (link)
Hey, another book you'll want to check out, even though it's not YA? Kelley Armstrong's BITTEN. Trust me. :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]chicklitter
2007-10-15 02:32 pm UTC (link)
I need to start writing these down. :-)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]jonaskaite
2007-10-15 03:46 am UTC (link)
There's nothing erotic about this book. Sensual, yes. Tantalizing, yes. But erotic?

I hit on the same thing in my (very brief) review, and it was one of the things I liked best about it!

Haha. Having just gone back and re-read said review, I realized I was really intending to read Eclipse as soon as it came out, and I haven't done yet. At this point, of course, I'm up to my ears in schoolwork and won't get to read it till January... *sigh*

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]calico_reaction
2007-10-15 09:22 pm UTC (link)
I just read your review. Interesting take! :) Hope you get to read book #3 soon! :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]acharmedlife
2007-10-15 04:55 am UTC (link)
I honestly found the book to be maddeningly slow and predictable. A lot of it felt very drawn out and methodic - Bella takes a shower. Bella goes into her room and puts her jammies on. Bella sleeps. Bella wakes up. Bella goes downstairs and eats some cheerios. Bella sees that it is raining outside. Bella grabs a coat and goes out to her car. Etc.

Interesting take on the vampire legends, though. I did like the degree to which Meyer incorporated the animalistic aspect of the vampires. It has often been neglected of late.

But honestly, once I finished Twilight, I found myself thinking that the book could have been a lot better if Meyer had left out about 300 or so pages. The story didn't get very interesting until the end. I don't have a burning desire to continue reading the series.

Oh, and to address your comment about how you found Bella's interest in vampirism slightly disturbing... quite honestly, I've often found that it's a common response among teen girls. They are so enchanted by the notion of a beautiful stranger who draws them in and for whom they fall head over heels that any real ability to reason goes out the window. In that sense, I suppose Bella's reaction isn't entirely unrealistic. But I agree... it is a frightening perspective to see. :)



(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]calico_reaction
2007-10-15 11:02 am UTC (link)
Oh, I definitely see what you're saying. It seems that Meyer was discovering everything as she wrote it, which is fine, but as a writer, one does need to know when to go back and starting cutting and pasting your own work. Who knows? :)

I think what's disturbing about Bella's fascination has more to do with the fact she's not considering the consequences of it (she'll have to drink blood, what will she say to her parents, etc), but again, that kind of mindset is indicative of teenage girls, so it shouldn't surprise me TOO much. :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]indongcho
2007-12-26 07:34 pm UTC (link)
We think alike, then. I've started criticizing Twilight chapter by chapter in The Venom Apple and...wow, there's so much dull filler in it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]jayamei
2007-10-15 01:56 pm UTC (link)
Ah yes, you are another one who waits for things to come in paperback (me too). That's why I haven't bought New Moon yet. I liked Twilight, and I read it before it got extremely popular so was surprised by it rather than read it expecting much. It was pleasant and has very ... school girl aspects, which was just FUN to indulge in. Twilight felt complete on its own to me, so I'm reluctant to start 2 and 3, but I'll read them eventually.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]calico_reaction
2007-10-15 09:23 pm UTC (link)
Definitely fun to indulge in. :)

The past couple of months I found myself on a hardcover kick, but I think I've kicked it, cause I just don't have the money, especially when I get usually get two paperbacks (or three) for the price of one hardcover.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]aurillia
2007-10-15 08:17 pm UTC (link)
I'm surprised by the reference to "erotic" - I haven't heard that, and you're right, it's not erotic at all. Meyer has no intention of it being erotic. "Sensual" and "tantalising" are good words to describe the "sexual tension" in this book - and the others, but Meyer resisted her publishers urging to put "pre-marital sex" in the books.

I think Edward's inability to read Bella's mind will be made clear in the 4th book. The 2nd showed that he's not the only vampire with special skills who Bella is immune to. It's intriguing - I like it!

(I find the ticks in the writing easy enough to ignore because I enjoy the story so much. Anything less and I'd be gnashing my teeth, as is usually the case!)

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]calico_reaction
2007-10-15 09:25 pm UTC (link)
That's interesting that she decided to make a stance against "pre-marital sex," but that doesn't bother me. What does bother me, at least in book one, is that when Bella gives in to her passion when Edward kisses her, he's always pushing her back, wanting her to be chaste. Granted, I know that passion can lead to sex, but it bothers me on a deeper level than that. Hmm...maybe I'll figure it out as I read later books... :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]aurillia
2007-10-16 06:00 pm UTC (link)
It does get explained/explored whatever. I think the main thing is that he's afraid of killing her; he doesn't want to lose control. He's also not a "modern" boy, and thinks pre-marital sex could possibly doom her soul. That's the gist of it anyway.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]calico_reaction
2007-10-16 08:22 pm UTC (link)
That makes a lot of sense, especially considering what century he's coming from. :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]purpleysawks
2007-11-07 01:58 am UTC (link)
Now that you mention it, I did notice the grimace thing :D

To me, it doesn't matter what version the book is in, as long as the others are consistent. If I have something in hardback, I want everything else in hardback. Same with paperback. It just annoys me if there's no consistency.

I still have yet to read New Moon, but my friend told me she cried through the entire book <.

(Reply to this)


[info]lysalie28
2007-11-13 09:53 pm UTC (link)
Hope it's okay to comment here. I read this book a while ago but didn't like it and didn't see why it was so popular. Maybe it's because I've read so many YA vampire novels that new ones just don't make big waves anymore.

On the other hand, I liked Wicked Lovely (another YA novel).

Have you heard about the Daughters of Destiny series by Jenna Solitaire? They're the only YA books that captured my interest recently (more so than Wicked Lovely and a lot more so than Twilight).

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]calico_reaction
2007-11-13 10:26 pm UTC (link)
Definitely okay to comment here! :)

Unlike a lot of readers, I'm not very well versed in vampire YA or adult, so I think I'm more forgiving, but from what I've read about the later books, I can see where I'll have trouble with them, so it'll be interesting to see how or if my opinion changes.

And no, I haven't heard of that, but thanks for the rec! I'll check it out sometime. :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]oxjam93xo
2007-12-08 02:17 pm UTC (link)
Writing-wise, Meyer has a few writing ticks, and she's got a horrible dependence on the word "grimace," which is horribly overused in the course of these 500 pages.

That and murmered/mumbled. I swear, no matter how much I love this book, I was murmered/mumbled out by the third chapter.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]goodbye___girl
2007-12-23 01:56 am UTC (link)
I have to agree with you. That is one thing that I'm not too fond of in her books is the use of murmured. Most of the time I can't even imagine what is being said, murmured!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]soleta_nf
2008-01-12 06:18 pm UTC (link)
Excellent review! I'm impressed. Do you have reviews of Scott Westerfeld's Uglies books? I just finished them now and am slightly obsessed...

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]calico_reaction
2008-01-13 10:47 pm UTC (link)
I haven't read them yet, but I want to. :) And thanks!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]soleta_nf
2008-01-14 01:50 am UTC (link)
You definitely should check them out!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]sinulatan
2008-01-14 07:47 am UTC (link)
This was the first vampire YA book I've read -- and that was when Meyer wasn't such a big author then. I agree with you when you said it's far from erotic. o__o

I like Twilight although the next two weren't as good. I'm just finishing the series for the sake of knowing what exactly happens in the end. xD

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]calico_reaction
2008-01-14 11:51 am UTC (link)
I've heard lots of people make that comment in regards to the other two. It'll be interesting to see what I think of them, when I get around to them. :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]indongcho
2008-02-17 10:26 am UTC (link)
I mean, what girl DOESN'T want to imagine herself attracting the adoration and love of a perfectly beautiful and gorgeous guy who's completely devoted to her

This is probably just the giddiness caused by lack of sleep and a massive headache, but I feel the need to say: lesbians and asexual girls!

And if I had to choose a favorite character from the books, it would be Alice.

Like you, I prefer Edward and Bella when they're being snarky. When they get lovey-dovey I tend to lose interest, especially because of Bella's over-use of fancy adjectives for how beautiful she finds Edward to be.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]calico_reaction
2008-02-17 04:08 pm UTC (link)
This is probably just the giddiness caused by lack of sleep and a massive headache, but I feel the need to say: lesbians and asexual girls!

Very true. ;)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…